Satellite antenna

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the satellite antenna, depicted in a deployed configuration, and showing the azimuth assembly, and the reflector and the feed assembly extending from the azimuth assembly;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the satellite antenna, opposite to that shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a side view of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a side view of the satellite antenna, opposite to that shown in FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is a front elevation of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a rear elevation of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 7 is a top plan view of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 8 is a bottom plan view of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the satellite antenna, depicted in a stowed configuration;

FIG. 10 is a perspective view of the satellite antenna, opposite to that shown in FIG. 9;

FIG. 11 is a side view of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 9;

FIG. 12 is a side view of the satellite antenna, opposite to that shown in FIG. 11;

FIG. 13 is a front elevation of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 9;

FIG. 14 is a rear elevation of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 9;

FIG. 15 is a top plan view of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 9; and,

FIG. 16 is a bottom plan view of the satellite antenna shown in FIG. 9.

The radio mounting holes provided in the feed assembly are depicted as small dots to indicate that they do not form part of the design. The mounting holes provided in the support arms of the reflector are depicted as small dots to indicate that they do not form part of the design. The perimeter of the recessed surface provided in the reflector is depicted using a broken line to indicate that the recessed surface does not form part of the design. Other features are also depicted using broken lines to indicate that they do not form part of the design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a satellite antenna, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Siemers; Matthew (Ottawa, CA), Smith; Ewan (Ottawa, CA)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Siemers; Matthew Smith; Ewan Ottawa Ottawa N/A N/A CA CA
Assignee:	C-Com Satellite Systems Inc. (Ottawa, CA)
Appl. No.:	D/387,567
Filed:	March 15, 2011

---

Current U.S. Class:	D14/231
Current International Class:	1403
Field of Search:	;D14/230-238,299 ;343/700R,840,841,908,872 ;455/3.02,FOR215,575.2

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D329052	September 1992	Keane et al.
5554998	September 1996	Sherwood et al.
D380474	July 1997	Pietrangelo et al.
5646638	July 1997	Winegard et al.
D389155	January 1998	Inoue
D411999	July 1999	Inoue
6124836	September 2000	Rogers
6166704	December 2000	Jan et al.
D443264	June 2001	Fujita
D458598	June 2002	Sato
6445361	September 2002	Liu et al.
D595276	June 2009	Bonnier
D597085	July 2009	Andersson
D598904	August 2009	Ho
7626560	December 2009	Conrad
7791553	September 2010	Conrad
D656132	March 2012	Barin
8169375	May 2012	Conrad
2002/0140617	October 2002	Luly et al.
2005/0057428	March 2005	Fujita
2007/0210980	September 2007	Shen
2007/0247390	October 2007	Lin et al.
2008/0186242	August 2008	Shuster et al.

Primary Examiner: Windmuller; John
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Heenan Blaikie LLP