Light reflector
Maxik , et al. May 15, 2
U.S. patent number D659,895 [Application Number D/391,913] was granted by the patent office on 2012-05-15 for light reflector. This patent grant is currently assigned to Lighting Science Group Corporation. Invention is credited to David E. Bartine, Fredric S. Maxik, Mark Andrew Oostdyk, James Lynn Schellack, Robert R. Soler.
| United States Patent | D659,895 |
| Maxik , et al. | May 15, 2012 |
Light reflector
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a light reflector, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Maxik; Fredric S. (Indialantic, FL), Soler; Robert R. (Cocoa Beach, FL), Schellack; James Lynn (Cocoa Beach, FL), Oostdyk; Mark Andrew (Cape Canaveral, FL), Bartine; David E. (Cocoa, FL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Lighting Science Group
Corporation (Satellite Beach, FL) |
| Appl. No.: | D/391,913 |
| Filed: | May 13, 2011 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D26/118 |
| Current International Class: | 2699 |
| Field of Search: | ;D26/38,36,46,73,76,81,84,88,118,138,120,13,154,155,145,86,87,85,142,61,24,93,92,153,91,74,121,122,71,110,105,111,131,83,80,1,2,3,4,5,26,89,123,125,128,63,62,64,65,41,69,139,152,150,151,141,143,144,51,140 ;362/269,648,238,111,105,86,373,294,362,297,346,341,356,352,433,404,235,240,249.01-249.11,321,287,374,427,190,281,324,272,244,555,147,348,263,350 ;D10/11,114.1 ;D22/108 ;42/146,117,114,115,116,142,1.01 ;439/110 ;403/92,97 ;285/69,78,65 ;257/89 ;D16/221 ;D13/110,133,134,179,180,182 ;160/332 ;D11/90,89,121,125,131 ;D25/119,124,125,138 ;D23/386 ;D8/373,354,349,389,382,363,356,377 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D174221 | March 1955 | Hatch et al. |
| D191762 | November 1961 | Rothman |
| 3692399 | September 1972 | Stewart |
| D277892 | March 1985 | Reding |
| D380850 | July 1997 | Bray |
| D390992 | February 1998 | Shemitz |
| D399862 | October 1998 | Baliozian |
| D422107 | March 2000 | Meier |
| D440683 | April 2001 | Guercio |
| D444258 | June 2001 | Bradford et al. |
| 6422709 | July 2002 | Panagiotou |
| D570037 | May 2008 | Hartman |
| D577146 | September 2008 | Haugaard et al. |
| D591440 | April 2009 | Maxik et al. |
| D612975 | March 2010 | Guercio et al. |
| D629548 | December 2010 | Cai |
| 2004/0037068 | February 2004 | Patterson et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Malek, Esq.; Mark R. Zies Widerman & Malek
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a light reflector according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a front elevation view of the light reflector illustrated in FIG. 1
FIG. 3 is a rear elevation view of the light reflector illustrated in FIG. 1 wherein the broken lines illustrate unclaimed portions of the light reflector and form no part of the claimed design.
FIG. 4 is a right side elevation view of the light reflector illustrated in FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is a left side elevation view of the light reflector illustrated in FIG. 1.
FIG. 6 is a top plan view of the light reflector illustrated in FIG. 1 wherein the broken lines illustrate unclaimed portions of the light reflector and form no part of the claimed design; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view of the light reflector illustrated in FIG. 1 wherein the broken lines illustrate unclaimed portions of the light reflector and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 