Dilator

Miles , et al. January 24, 2

Patent Grant D652922

U.S. patent number D652,922 [Application Number D/360,369] was granted by the patent office on 2012-01-24 for dilator. This patent grant is currently assigned to NuVasive, Inc.. Invention is credited to Eric Finley, Scot Martinelli, Patrick Miles.


United States Patent D652,922
Miles ,   et al. January 24, 2012

Dilator

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a dilator, as shown and described.
Inventors: Miles; Patrick (San Diego, CA), Martinelli; Scot (Mountain Top, PA), Finley; Eric (Poway, CA)
Assignee: NuVasive, Inc. (San Diego, CA)
Family ID: 41009160
Appl. No.: D/360,369
Filed: April 23, 2010

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
12428081 Apr 22, 2009
10608362 Sep 1, 2009 7582058

Current U.S. Class: D24/135
Current CPC Class: A61B5/4893 20130101; A61B5/7405 20130101; A61B17/0206 20130101; A61B17/0218 20130101; A61B5/742 20130101; A61B5/296 20210101; A61B17/0293 20130101; A61B1/32 20130101; A61B17/025 20130101; A61B17/02 20130101; A61B2017/00026 20130101; A61B2017/00039 20130101; A61B2017/0262 20130101; A61B2017/0256 20130101
Current International Class: 2402
Field of Search: ;D24/135,112,130,133,140,147,149 ;600/200,202,184,220-227,201,203,210-218 ;606/191-200,201-202

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
208227 September 1878 Dorr
972983 October 1910 Arthur
1328624 January 1920 Graham
3803716 April 1974 Garnier
3888004 June 1975 Coleman
4545374 October 1985 Jacobson
4573448 March 1986 Kambin
D295445 April 1988 Freeman
5007902 April 1991 Witt
5171279 December 1992 Mathews
5295994 March 1994 Bonutti
5312417 May 1994 Wilk
5331975 July 1994 Bonutti
5342384 August 1994 Sugarbaker
5378241 January 1995 Haindl
5395317 March 1995 Kambin
5509893 April 1996 Pracas
5514153 May 1996 Bonutti
5599279 February 1997 Slotman
5707359 January 1998 Bufalini
5762629 June 1998 Kambin
5792044 August 1998 Foley
5814073 September 1998 Bonutti
5817071 October 1998 Dewindt
5888196 March 1999 Bonutti
5902231 May 1999 Foley
5976146 November 1999 Ogawa
6007487 December 1999 Foley
6010520 January 2000 Pattison
6146371 November 2000 DeWindt
6152871 November 2000 Foley
6161047 December 2000 King
6206826 March 2001 Mathews
6217509 April 2001 Foley
6217527 April 2001 Selmon
6221049 April 2001 Selmon
6231546 May 2001 Milo
6270505 August 2001 Yoshida
6292701 September 2001 Prass
6325764 December 2001 Griffith
6395007 May 2002 Bhatnagar
6425859 July 2002 Foley
6447484 September 2002 Briscoe
6514217 February 2003 Selmon
6520907 February 2003 Foley
6535759 March 2003 Epstein
6564078 May 2003 Marino
6641613 November 2003 Sennett
6645194 November 2003 Briscoe
6679833 January 2004 Smith
6719692 April 2004 Kleffner
6847849 January 2005 Mamo
6855105 February 2005 Jackson
6916330 July 2005 Simonson
6926728 August 2005 Zucherman
6929606 August 2005 Ritland
7008431 March 2006 Simonson
7074226 July 2006 Roehm
7083625 August 2006 Berry
7198598 April 2007 Smith
7207949 April 2007 Miles
7226451 June 2007 Shluzas
7276055 October 2007 DeWindt
7311719 December 2007 Bonutti
7470236 December 2008 Kelleher
7582058 September 2009 Miles et al.
D605760 December 2009 George et al.
2001/0056280 December 2001 Underwood
2002/0010392 January 2002 Desai
2003/0139648 July 2003 Foley
2004/0181231 September 2004 Emstad
2005/0004593 January 2005 Simonson
2005/0070949 March 2005 Bakos et al.
2005/0125021 June 2005 Nance et al.
2006/0052669 March 2006 Hart
2006/0052828 March 2006 Kim
2007/0083161 April 2007 Briscoe
2007/0129747 June 2007 Dorman
2009/0259108 October 2009 Miles et al.
2010/0094093 April 2010 Miles et al.
2010/0105986 April 2010 Miles et al.
2010/0113884 May 2010 Miles et al.
Primary Examiner: Eland; Bridget L
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Spangler; Jonathan Schermerhorn; Rory Saidman DesignLaw Group, LLC

Description



The sole FIGURE is a perspective view of a dilator showing our new design.

The broken lines illustrate part of the distal portion that forms no part of the claimed design. The dilator is circular as seen from the end. The break line is shown at the wide end to indicate that only the distal portion of the dilator is illustrated. Only one view of the article is shown in the drawing or described in the specification. It is understood that the appearance of any part of the article not shown in the drawing or described in the specification forms no part of the claimed design.

Therefore, the determination of patentability is based on the design for the article shown and described.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed