U.S. patent number D649,409 [Application Number D/371,542] was granted by the patent office on 2011-11-29 for food container. Invention is credited to Alexander Segal.
United States Patent | D649,409 |
Segal | November 29, 2011 |
Inventors: | Segal; Alexander (Richmond Hill, CA) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/371,542 |
Filed: | April 12, 2011 |
Current U.S. Class: | D7/629 |
Current International Class: | 0707 |
Field of Search: | ;D7/602,629,630,538-542,612-615,584,586,587 ;D3/273 ;D9/424-432 |
4700842 | October 1987 | Grusin |
4787527 | November 1988 | Monetti |
4819824 | April 1989 | Longbottom et al. |
4976370 | December 1990 | Cassel |
D351090 | October 1994 | Narsutis |
D439159 | March 2001 | Chen |
D440470 | April 2001 | Tucker et al. |
D449495 | October 2001 | Tucker et al. |
D469689 | February 2003 | Buchalski et al. |
D483622 | December 2003 | Kim |
D541598 | May 2007 | Kim |
D546632 | July 2007 | Oberloier |
D568693 | May 2008 | Furlong |
D591112 | April 2009 | Wang |
D606812 | December 2009 | Wu |
D610878 | March 2010 | Kim |
D611807 | March 2010 | Miga, Jr. |
D614919 | May 2010 | Carlson |
D614950 | May 2010 | Colacitti |
D618516 | June 2010 | DiPietro et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.