Surface protection mat
Wright July 26, 2
U.S. patent number D642,003 [Application Number D/359,655] was granted by the patent office on 2011-07-26 for surface protection mat. Invention is credited to Rickie J. Wright.
| United States Patent | D642,003 |
| Wright | July 26, 2011 |
Surface protection mat
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for surface protection mat, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Wright; Rickie J. (Canton, MI) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/359,655 |
| Filed: | April 14, 2010 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12175964 | Jul 18, 2008 | ||||
| 11451706 | Jun 13, 2006 | 7597949 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/592 |
| Current International Class: | 0611 |
| Field of Search: | ;D5/1,2,9,11,12,43,47,50,54,56,59 ;D6/582,583,585,586,592,594,605 ;D9/707,713 ;D12/203 ;4/581,582 ;5/420 ;15/215 ;52/660 ;66/169R ;428/15,32,66.5,112,187,221,542.6 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 1641029 | August 1927 | Gaudet |
| 2139512 | December 1938 | Nagorny |
| 2187676 | January 1940 | Biewen |
| 2460654 | February 1949 | Reinstein |
| 3488081 | January 1970 | Nolen |
| 4285075 | August 1981 | Nelson |
| 4328275 | May 1982 | Vargo |
| 4439474 | March 1984 | Sagel |
| 4484661 | November 1984 | Evenson |
| D281752 | December 1985 | Dickens et al. |
| 4609580 | September 1986 | Rockett et al. |
| 4766626 | August 1988 | Green |
| 4798754 | January 1989 | Tomek |
| 4822669 | April 1989 | Roga |
| 4826030 | May 1989 | Valley |
| 5018235 | May 1991 | Stamatiou et al. |
| 5028468 | July 1991 | Taylor |
| 5080956 | January 1992 | Smith |
| 5114774 | May 1992 | Maxim, Jr. |
| 5128189 | July 1992 | Bartlett |
| 5270089 | December 1993 | Alston et al. |
| 5383570 | January 1995 | Gordon |
| 5506040 | April 1996 | Cordani |
| 5549945 | August 1996 | Lind |
| 5613332 | March 1997 | Saylor, Jr. |
| D385142 | October 1997 | Sparks |
| D409427 | May 1999 | Ford et al. |
| 5916658 | June 1999 | Mohr |
| D423439 | April 2000 | Moore |
| 6295658 | October 2001 | Jenkins |
| 6329040 | December 2001 | Oshima et al. |
| 6446275 | September 2002 | Wright et al. |
| 6446289 | September 2002 | Su et al. |
| 6673409 | January 2004 | Wheatley |
| D493999 | August 2004 | Ruhl et al. |
| D497277 | October 2004 | Ruhl et al. |
| 6875494 | April 2005 | Burns et al. |
| D552910 | October 2007 | Connor |
| 2001/0053816 | December 2001 | Kinoshita et al. |
| 2006/0029773 | February 2006 | Waterman et al. |
| 2008/0280095 | November 2008 | Wright |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Gifford, Krass, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski, P.C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top view showing a surface protection mat;
FIG. 2 is a bottom view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear view thereof
FIG. 5 is an oblique and enlarged detail view showing an area within the peripheral border of the design of FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 6 is a side view of the design of FIG. 1.
The broken lines upon the surface of the surface protection mat form no part of the claimed design. The object feature surrounding the inside perimeter of the design represents unclaimed environmental subject matter.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 