Electronic document reader

Flagiello , et al. July 12, 2

Patent Grant D641352

U.S. patent number D641,352 [Application Number D/361,991] was granted by the patent office on 2011-07-12 for electronic document reader. This patent grant is currently assigned to Plastic Logic Limited. Invention is credited to Francis James Canova, Jr., Caroline Flagiello, Carl Hayton, Kenneth Ralph Venegas, James Yurchenco, Martin Zabaleta.


United States Patent D641,352
Flagiello ,   et al. July 12, 2011

Electronic document reader

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for an electronic document reader, as shown and described.
Inventors: Flagiello; Caroline (San Francisco, CA), Zabaleta; Martin (Menlo Park, CA), Yurchenco; James (Palo Alto, CA), Canova, Jr.; Francis James (Fremont, CA), Hayton; Carl (Cambridge, GB), Venegas; Kenneth Ralph (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Plastic Logic Limited (Cambridgeshire, GB)
Appl. No.: D/361,991
Filed: May 18, 2010

Foreign Application Priority Data

Nov 18, 2009 [EM] 001178552-0001
Nov 18, 2009 [EM] 001178552-0002
Current U.S. Class: D14/341
Current International Class: 1402
Field of Search: ;D14/341-347,137,138,138.1,138AA,138R,138AB,138G,138A,496,426,429,129,130,420,439-441,448,125,147,156,218,250,336,203.1,203.3,203.4,203.7,315,388-390 ;D21/324,329,330 ;D10/65,104 ;D18/6-7 ;345/169,901,905,156,157,168,173 ;361/680,686,679.27,679.3 ;379/433.04,433.07,433.11,916,433.01,433.06

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D284084 June 1986 Ferrara, Jr.
D320982 October 1991 Siddoway
D482026 November 2003 Helin
D488809 April 2004 Kamegi
D500991 January 2005 Niitsu
D504889 May 2005 Andre et al.
D519501 April 2006 Yamashiro
D525975 August 2006 Khovaylo
7336479 February 2008 Liu et al.
D565564 April 2008 Nakagawa et al.
D569629 May 2008 Yu et al.
D580431 November 2008 Morita
D584738 January 2009 Kim et al.
D585888 February 2009 Watson et al.
D586798 February 2009 Tanaka et al.
D589509 March 2009 Takemasa
D590374 April 2009 Madonna et al.
D594454 June 2009 Honda
D598016 August 2009 Han et al.
D602487 October 2009 Maskatia
D605192 December 2009 Lin
D608778 January 2010 Lee et al.
D610582 February 2010 Sugitani et al.
D613951 April 2010 Tang et al.
D617793 June 2010 Chiang et al.
D622692 August 2010 McWilliam et al.
2007/0120878 May 2007 Hsiao et al.
2009/0160790 June 2009 Fukushima et al.
2009/0231292 September 2009 Hsieh et al.
Primary Examiner: Brooks; Cathron
Assistant Examiner: Fox; Barbara
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Knobbe, Martens, Olson, and Bear, LLP

Description



FIG. 1 is a front side, right side, and bottom side perspective view of the electronic document reader of the present design;

FIG. 2 is a rear side, left side, and bottom side perspective view of an embodiment of the electronic document reader of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a front side elevational view of the electronic document reader of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a rear side elevational view of the electronic document reader of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a right side elevational view of the electronic document reader of FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view of the electronic document reader of FIG. 1; and,

FIG. 7 is a top plan view of the electronic document reader of FIG. 1.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed