U.S. patent number D625,865 [Application Number D/358,572] was granted by the patent office on 2010-10-19 for dynamo rechargeable torch. This patent grant is currently assigned to Flying Dragon Development Limited. Invention is credited to Tit Wing Poon.
United States Patent | D625,865 |
Poon | October 19, 2010 |
Inventors: | Poon; Tit Wing (New Territories, HK) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Flying Dragon Development
Limited (New Territories, HK) |
Appl. No.: | D/358,572 |
Filed: | March 29, 2010 |
Current U.S. Class: | D26/48 |
Current International Class: | 2602 |
Field of Search: | ;D26/37,38,42,46,48,49,50,51 ;362/157,158,183,184,187,190,194-197,192,193,198,202-208 |
D463877 | October 2002 | Kung |
D476437 | June 2003 | Dalton et al. |
D480824 | October 2003 | Englert et al. |
D480825 | October 2003 | Englert et al. |
D498014 | November 2004 | Cormier et al. |
D522673 | June 2006 | Yuen |
D565214 | March 2008 | Lee |
D565215 | March 2008 | Lee |
D566870 | April 2008 | Yuen |
D567420 | April 2008 | Ho |
D593694 | June 2009 | Bent |
D601284 | September 2009 | Schonenbach |
D601736 | October 2009 | Swan |
D619743 | July 2010 | Liu |
2006/0221601 | October 2006 | Yuen |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.