U.S. patent number D622,905 [Application Number D/351,563] was granted by the patent office on 2010-08-31 for shaving razor cartridge. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Gillette Company. Invention is credited to Kevin James Wain.
United States Patent | D622,905 |
Wain | August 31, 2010 |
Inventors: | Wain; Kevin James (Reading, GB) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Gillette Company (Boston,
MA) |
Appl. No.: | D/351,563 |
Filed: | December 8, 2009 |
Current U.S. Class: | D28/47 |
Current International Class: | 2803 |
Field of Search: | ;D28/44-48 ;30/32,34.05,34.1-34.2,41,44-46,47-51,57-58,77-84,526-539 |
2343913 | March 1944 | Lenta |
2807084 | September 1957 | Harman |
3259978 | July 1966 | Weichselbaum |
4069580 | January 1978 | Cartwright et al. |
4146958 | April 1979 | Chen et al. |
D327336 | June 1992 | Chen |
D329105 | September 1992 | Chen |
5412872 | May 1995 | Iderosa |
D467387 | December 2002 | Wonderley |
D499511 | December 2004 | Wakayama |
D541987 | May 2007 | Sugawara |
D552795 | October 2007 | Wonderley |
D601753 | October 2009 | Cataudella et al. |
D602634 | October 2009 | Cataudella et al. |
D611199 | March 2010 | Kwiecien et al. |
2009/0188112 | July 2009 | Prochaska et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.