U.S. patent number D612,811 [Application Number D/324,455] was granted by the patent office on 2010-03-30 for contact isolator. This patent grant is currently assigned to Tyco Electronics Corporation. Invention is credited to Christopher George Daily, David F. Fleming, Matthew Edward Mostoller.
United States Patent | D612,811 |
Daily , et al. | March 30, 2010 |
Inventors: | Daily; Christopher George (Harrisburg, PA), Mostoller; Matthew Edward (Hummelstown, PA), Fleming; David F. (Palmyra, PA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Tyco Electronics Corporation
(Berwyn, PA) |
Appl. No.: | D/324,455 |
Filed: | September 12, 2008 |
Current U.S. Class: | D13/154 |
Current International Class: | 1303 |
Field of Search: | ;D13/133,146-147,154,184 ;439/607-610,732,844,851-852,865,867,872,877,884 |
D236250 | August 1975 | Walton |
4759726 | July 1988 | Naylor et al. |
6036545 | March 2000 | Caviness et al. |
D471876 | March 2003 | Jaag |
6575761 | June 2003 | Regnier |
6679728 | January 2004 | Huang et al. |
6683773 | January 2004 | Montena |
6776621 | August 2004 | Dye |
6944005 | September 2005 | Kooiman |
7014480 | March 2006 | Weidner et al. |
7137825 | November 2006 | Myer et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.