U.S. patent number D612,764 [Application Number D/311,249] was granted by the patent office on 2010-03-30 for buckle. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nuna International B.V.. Invention is credited to Jonathan Kirk Mountz, Nathanael Saint.
United States Patent | D612,764 |
Mountz , et al. | March 30, 2010 |
Inventors: | Mountz; Jonathan Kirk (Elverson, PA), Saint; Nathanael (Morgantown, PA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Nuna International B.V.
(Amsterdam, NL) |
Appl. No.: | D/311,249 |
Filed: | January 29, 2009 |
Current U.S. Class: | D11/216 |
Current International Class: | 0207 |
Field of Search: | ;D11/200,214,215,216,218,220,230,231 ;D8/382,383,339 ;297/484 ;24/614,615,625,629,633,579.09,636 ;D3/215 ;D2/627 ;D29/101.1 |
5269051 | December 1993 | McFalls |
D364124 | November 1995 | Lortz et al. |
6363590 | April 2002 | Lan |
6393677 | May 2002 | Anscher |
6463638 | October 2002 | Pontaoe |
6606770 | August 2003 | Badrenas Buscart |
6796007 | September 2004 | Anscher |
6868591 | March 2005 | Dingman et al. |
D515456 | February 2006 | Gastaldi |
7360287 | April 2008 | Cerruti et al. |
D580820 | November 2008 | Daykin |
7464447 | December 2008 | Khalifa et al. |
D599701 | September 2009 | Jacobs et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.