U.S. patent number D607,525 [Application Number D/339,517] was granted by the patent office on 2010-01-05 for aquatic toy. This patent grant is currently assigned to Aqua-Leisure Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Ralph C. Marciano.
United States Patent | D607,525 |
Marciano | January 5, 2010 |
Inventors: | Marciano; Ralph C. (Riverside, RI) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Aqua-Leisure Industries, Inc.
(Avon, MA) |
Appl. No.: | D/339,517 |
Filed: | July 1, 2009 |
Current U.S. Class: | D21/769; D21/803 |
Current International Class: | 2102 |
Field of Search: | ;D21/760,761,765,766,769-770,801,803,809 ;D6/392,596,601,604 ;472/128-129 ;D12/5,6,316 ;114/253,345-346 ;441/35,66,40-42,129-132 ;D24/123,183,189 ;5/630,652,653 |
3027657 | April 1962 | La Pollo |
D344120 | February 1994 | Helt et al. |
D346194 | April 1994 | Ferris |
D379647 | June 1997 | Levinthal |
D394502 | May 1998 | Jones |
D401287 | November 1998 | Ritzinger |
5921898 | July 1999 | McDonald |
D442247 | May 2001 | Koester et al. |
D457241 | May 2002 | Dunshee et al. |
D552201 | October 2007 | Kwak |
D572332 | July 2008 | Sramek et al. |
D583006 | December 2008 | Hennings, III |
D591548 | May 2009 | LaFratta |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.