U.S. patent number D606,732 [Application Number D/335,467] was granted by the patent office on 2009-12-29 for shoe. This patent grant is currently assigned to Columbia Insurance Company. Invention is credited to Thomas E. McClaskie.
United States Patent | D606,732 |
McClaskie | December 29, 2009 |
Inventors: | McClaskie; Thomas E. (Bethlehem, PA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Columbia Insurance Company
(Omaha, NE) |
Appl. No.: | D/335,467 |
Filed: | April 16, 2009 |
Current U.S. Class: | D2/951; D2/953; D2/959 |
Current International Class: | 0204 |
Field of Search: | ;D2/947,951,952,953,957,959,960 ;36/3B,22R,24.5,25R,67A,59C,103 |
D80001 | November 1929 | Wydom |
D335953 | June 1993 | Tyng |
D370993 | June 1996 | Mangee |
D449155 | October 2001 | McClaskie |
D465079 | November 2002 | Merceron |
D468083 | January 2003 | Morais |
D482851 | December 2003 | McClaskie |
D495477 | September 2004 | McClaskie |
D513842 | January 2006 | Paytuvi |
D543679 | June 2007 | Edwards |
D545534 | July 2007 | McClaskie |
D554331 | November 2007 | Matis |
D557886 | December 2007 | McClaskie |
D568035 | May 2008 | McClaskie |
D593738 | June 2009 | McClaskie |
D595036 | June 2009 | Link |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.