Key holder
Oksanen March 3, 2
U.S. patent number D587,449 [Application Number D/317,304] was granted by the patent office on 2009-03-03 for key holder. Invention is credited to Rauno Oksanen.
| United States Patent | D587,449 |
| Oksanen | March 3, 2009 |
Key holder
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a key holder, as shown.
| Inventors: | Oksanen; Rauno (Culver City, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/317,304 |
| Filed: | April 25, 2008 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/207 |
| Current International Class: | 0301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D3/207-212 ;D11/31-33,44,48-51,66 ;70/456R,456B,457-460 ;24/3.6 ;D13/168 ;362/116 ;D8/348 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D392201 | March 1998 | Chen |
| D475195 | June 2003 | Christianson |
| D476805 | July 2003 | Kan |
| D554363 | November 2007 | Bates et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Green; Kenneth L. Averill, Jr.; Edgar W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of the key holder.
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof.
FIG. 3 is a left side view thereof, the right side being a mirror image.
FIG. 4 is a bottom view thereof.
FIG. 5 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a rear view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 