U.S. patent number D587,069 [Application Number D/297,942] was granted by the patent office on 2009-02-24 for mug press. This patent grant is currently assigned to Pi-Design AG. Invention is credited to Jorgen Bodum.
United States Patent | D587,069 |
Bodum | February 24, 2009 |
Inventors: | Bodum; Jorgen (Meggen, CH) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Pi-Design AG (Triengen,
CH) |
Appl. No.: | D/297,942 |
Filed: | November 21, 2007 |
May 23, 2007 [DK] | DA 2007 00134 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D7/510; D7/511 |
Current International Class: | 0701 |
Field of Search: | ;D7/213,300-305,505-509,589,592,320,321,312,510,511,533,532,514,543-548,534-538,598,600,318,605,2,3,4,9,38,52,58,81,550.1,553.1,553.5,554.3,554.4,619.1,630 ;D9/737,738,741,744,551,671 ;D3/202,30.1,99,36 ;99/317,323,323.3,285,321 ;100/123 ;126/348 ;206/217,541,150,501,45 ;211/71,49.1,53,74,77,78,79 ;215/388,227-354 ;220/592.16,592.17,592.2,592.21,703-716,735,28,23.83,756,769,771,23.4,23.86 ;222/130,189.07,108,500,129 ;248/311.2 |
D453446 | February 2002 | Bodum |
D458081 | June 2002 | Bodum |
6824003 | November 2004 | Wong |
6921179 | July 2005 | Diak Ghanem |
D562065 | February 2008 | Smaldone |
D569181 | May 2008 | Homma |
D574190 | August 2008 | Homma |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.