Fence bracket
Robbins, III , et al. February 10, 2
U.S. patent number D586,206 [Application Number D/298,699] was granted by the patent office on 2009-02-10 for fence bracket. This patent grant is currently assigned to Edward S. Robbins, III. Invention is credited to Harry L. Raney, Jason T. Reiff, Edward S. Robbins, III, John C. Saylor.
| United States Patent | D586,206 |
| Robbins, III , et al. | February 10, 2009 |
Fence bracket
Claims
CLAIM We claim the ornamental design for a fence bracket, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Robbins, III; Edward S. (Muscle Shoals, AL), Reiff; Jason T. (N. Mankato, MN), Raney; Harry L. (Florence, AL), Saylor; John C. (Florence, AL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Robbins, III; Edward S. (Muscle
Shoals, AL) |
| Appl. No.: | D/298,699 |
| Filed: | December 11, 2007 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29266980 | Oct 2, 2006 | D566526 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D8/380 |
| Current International Class: | 0805 |
| Field of Search: | ;D8/394,382,380,363,354,373,371,349 ;D3/220 ;D13/147,137.4,137.3,137.2,199 ;D11/220 ;256/65.01-65.08,58,52,49,47 ;248/909,73,68.1,200 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 1657939 | January 1928 | Rockwell |
| D130744 | December 1941 | Krasemann |
| D207067 | February 1967 | Griffin |
| D208580 | September 1967 | Margulis |
| 3669413 | June 1972 | Laible |
| D244748 | June 1977 | Canterbury |
| D263788 | April 1982 | McKinnon et al. |
| D266223 | September 1982 | Swartz |
| 4465263 | August 1984 | Robbins, Jr. |
| D285647 | September 1986 | Sachs |
| 4684107 | August 1987 | Robbins, Jr. |
| 4688769 | August 1987 | Smrt |
| 4709887 | December 1987 | Bongiovanni et al. |
| RE32707 | July 1988 | Robbins, Jr. |
| 4860996 | August 1989 | Robbins, III |
| 4881721 | November 1989 | Manley |
| 5100109 | March 1992 | Robbins, III |
| 5189766 | March 1993 | Weber |
| D347533 | June 1994 | Lambert |
| D368648 | April 1996 | Losier |
| 5547322 | August 1996 | Lilja et al. |
| 5615850 | April 1997 | Cloninger |
| 5660505 | August 1997 | Emory, III |
| D383966 | September 1997 | Zaccagni |
| D399486 | October 1998 | Deans |
| 6039307 | March 2000 | De Zen |
| 6152429 | November 2000 | Pettigrew |
| 6533881 | March 2003 | Wall |
| D481654 | November 2003 | Matsui et al. |
| D495972 | September 2004 | Pettingill |
| D507959 | August 2005 | Mottini |
| D520322 | May 2006 | Orlando |
| D536957 | February 2007 | Reiff |
| D556130 | November 2007 | Tajima et al. |
| D561563 | February 2008 | Hoffner |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevation view of a fence bracket of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is an elevation view of the opposite side of the fence bracket shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is an elevation view from the right side of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is an elevation view from the left side of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is an elevation view from the top of FIG. 1.
FIG. 6 is an elevation view from the bottom FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 7 is a perspective view from the bottom right of FIG. 1.
The broken lines depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 