U.S. patent number D575,537 [Application Number D/289,808] was granted by the patent office on 2008-08-26 for salon chair with dual tubular side arms. This patent grant is currently assigned to P.S. Pibbs, Inc.. Invention is credited to Giulio Petruccelli.
United States Patent | D575,537 |
Petruccelli | August 26, 2008 |
Inventors: | Petruccelli; Giulio (Flushing, NY) |
---|---|
Assignee: | P.S. Pibbs, Inc. (Flushing,
NY) |
Appl. No.: | D/289,808 |
Filed: | August 2, 2007 |
Current U.S. Class: | D6/334 |
Current International Class: | 0601 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/334,335,341,353,360,364,367,369,371,376,377,379-381,500-502 ;297/445.1,446.1 ;5/12.1 |
D142239 | August 1945 | Jones |
D174472 | April 1955 | Roth |
D182174 | February 1958 | Galman |
D215429 | September 1969 | Sickler |
D275242 | August 1984 | Stephens |
D276768 | December 1984 | Enthoven |
D289469 | April 1987 | Tonon |
D309382 | July 1990 | Buhk |
D333739 | March 1993 | Yeh |
D367565 | March 1996 | Yeh |
D395764 | July 1998 | Dozsa-Farkas |
D457006 | May 2002 | Ooyama |
D489911 | May 2004 | Muller |
D502330 | March 2005 | Petruccelli |
D526146 | August 2006 | Kita |
D527931 | September 2006 | Kita |
D558480 | January 2008 | Olano Jauregui |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.