U.S. patent number D572,986 [Application Number D/279,918] was granted by the patent office on 2008-07-15 for ground spike.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Peak Innovations Inc.. Invention is credited to Simon Walker, Jianzhong Zhu.
United States Patent |
D572,986 |
Zhu , et al. |
July 15, 2008 |
Ground spike
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for ground spike, as shown and
described.
Inventors: |
Zhu; Jianzhong (Suzhou,
CN), Walker; Simon (Surrey, CA) |
Assignee: |
Peak Innovations Inc.
(Richmond, British Columbia, unknown)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/279,918 |
Filed: |
May 10, 2007 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
Current U.S.
Class: |
D8/1 |
Current International
Class: |
0801 |
Field of
Search: |
;D8/1,388 ;47/47
;D21/840 ;135/118 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 144 870 |
|
Nov 1984 |
|
EP |
|
2 268 523 |
|
Dec 1994 |
|
GB |
|
2 284 435 |
|
Jul 1995 |
|
GB |
|
2 322 877 |
|
Sep 1998 |
|
GB |
|
2 355 996 |
|
Sep 2001 |
|
GB |
|
Primary Examiner: Baynham; Holly H.
Assistant Examiner: Friedman; Sheryl
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hopkinson; Mark
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a first embodiment of the
design;
FIG. 2 is a front side view of the first embodiment of the
design;
FIG. 3 is a rear side view of the first embodiment of the
design;
FIG. 4 is a left side view of the first embodiment of the
design;
FIG. 5 is a right side view of the first embodiment of the
design;
FIG. 6 is an enlarged fragmentary perspective view of the first
embodiment of the design;
FIG. 7 is a top view of the first embodiment of the design;
FIG. 8 is a bottom view of the first embodiment of the design;
FIG. 9 is a top view of a second embodiment of the design; and,
FIG. 10 is a bottom view of the second embodiment of the
design.
The front, rear, left, right and perspective views of the second
embodiment are not shown, however the second embodiment is the same
as the first embodiment except that the blade portion is rotated by
45.degree. with respect to the socket portion of the design. This
difference between embodiments is clearly shown in a comparison of
bottom views, namely FIGS. 8 and 10.
* * * * *