Intravenous site securement device for catheters

Dikeman , et al. April 29, 2

Patent Grant D567941

U.S. patent number D567,941 [Application Number D/276,851] was granted by the patent office on 2008-04-29 for intravenous site securement device for catheters. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nexus Medical, LLC. Invention is credited to Steve A. Cash, W. Cary Dikeman, Larry C. Smith, Chris Winsor.


United States Patent D567,941
Dikeman ,   et al. April 29, 2008

Intravenous site securement device for catheters

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for an intravenous site securement device for catheters, as shown and described.
Inventors: Dikeman; W. Cary (Lenexa, KS), Winsor; Chris (Olathe, KS), Cash; Steve A. (Overland Park, KS), Smith; Larry C. (Lenexa, KS)
Assignee: Nexus Medical, LLC (Lenexa, KS)
Appl. No.: D/276,851
Filed: February 7, 2007

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
29245311 Dec 21, 2005

Current U.S. Class: D24/128
Current International Class: 2402
Field of Search: ;D24/128,189 ;D30/133,155 ;128/DIG.6,DIG.126 ;604/174,178-180 ;602/41-47,50,54-55

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
3256880 June 1966 Caypinar
4114626 September 1978 Beran
4129128 December 1978 McFarlane
4392857 July 1983 Beran
D293717 January 1988 Proulx et al.
D401329 November 1998 Bierman
6024761 February 2000 Barone et al.
6572588 June 2003 Bierman et al.
D480144 September 2003 Adams et al.
6663600 December 2003 Bierman et al.
2002/0026152 February 2002 Bierman
2004/0167475 August 2004 Wright et al.

Other References

Complaint [dated Jan. 29, 2007] Venetec Int.'l, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC, USDC D.Del., Case No. 1:07-CV-00057. cited by other .
Nexus Medical, LLC's Answer to Venetec International, Inc.'s Complaint and Counterclaim [dated Mar. 22, 2007]. Venetec Int'l, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC, USDC D.Del., Case No. 1:07-CV-00057. cited by other .
Venetec International, Inc.'s Reply to Nexus Medical, LLC's Counterclaim [filed Apr. 11, 2007]. Venetec Int'l, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC, USDC D.Del., Case No. 1:07-CV-00057. cited by other .
First Supplemental Complaint [dated Jul. 24, 2007]. Venetec Int'l, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC, USDC D.Del., Case No. 1:07-CV-00057. cited by other .
Nexus Medical, LLC's Answer to Venetec International, Inc.'s First Supplemental Complaint and Counterclaim [dated Aug. 8, 2007]. Venetec Int'l, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC, USDC D.Del., Case No. 1:07-CV-00057. cited by other .
Venetec International, Inc.'s Reply to Nexus Medical, LLC's Counterclaim [filed Aug. 28, 2007]. Venetec Int.'l, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC, USDC D.Del., Case No. 1:07-CV-00057. cited by other .
Second Supplemental Complaint [filed Sep. 5, 2007]. Venetec Int'l, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC, USDC D.Del., Case No. 1:07-CV-00057. cited by other .
Nexus Medical, LLC's Answer to Venetec International, Inc.'s Second Supplemental Complaint and Counterclaim [filed Sep. 19, 2007]. Venetec Int'l, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC, USDC D.Del., Case No. 1:07-CV-00057. cited by other .
Venetec International Inc.'s Reply to Nexus Medical, LLC's Counterclaim [filed Sep. 27, 2007]. Venetec Int'l, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC, USDC D.Del., Case No. 1:07-CV-00057. cited by other .
Request For Inter Partes Reexamination Under 37 C.F.R. 1.913 [filed Jun. 25, 2007]. In re Bierman, USPTO, Reexamination No. 95/000,271. cited by other .
Civil Docket for Case No. 1:07-CV-00057 [printed Oct. 22, 2007]. cited by other.

Primary Examiner: Zarfas; Louis S
Assistant Examiner: Goodman; Eric L
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hovey Williams LLP

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an intravenous site securement device for catheters embodying our design, with the catheter, the adhesive strip for securing the device to the patient, the posts and frusto-spherical head ends of the platform connectors, and the retainer being shown in broken lines for illustrative purposes only and forming no part of the claimed design;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the device similar to FIG. 1, but with the catheter, adhesive strip, and retainer being removed so that only the platform is depicted;

FIG. 3 a top elevation view of the device as depicted in FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is an end elevation view of the device as depicted in FIGS. 2 and 3, with the opposite end elevation view being a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 5 is a side elevation view of the device as depicted in FIGS. 2 4, with the opposite side elevation view being a mirror image thereof; and,

FIG. 6 is a bottom elevation view of the device as depicted in FIGS. 2 5, with the structure on the underside of the platform being shown in broken lines for illustrative purposes only and forming no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed