U.S. patent number D565,785 [Application Number D/243,712] was granted by the patent office on 2008-04-01 for photocatalytic lamp module for an air purifier. Invention is credited to William Thomas Kerr.
United States Patent | D565,785 |
Kerr | April 1, 2008 |
Inventors: | Kerr; William Thomas (Monticello, FL) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/243,712 |
Filed: | November 29, 2005 |
Current U.S. Class: | D26/113 |
Current International Class: | 2699 |
Field of Search: | ;D26/72,63,85,28,124,118,65,60,40,41,42,80,87,68,67,37,49,74,77,86,88,89,93,103,104,105,113,114,119,122,123,128,138,142,143,152 ;362/365,96,147,151,153,217,643,654,257,290,296,297,301,302,309,317,341,342,343,347,348,349,362,364,395,404,405,410,441 ;126/258 |
4694179 | September 1987 | Lew et al. |
D292236 | October 1987 | Caldwell |
D350620 | September 1994 | Yuen |
D357058 | April 1995 | Engelhard |
5933702 | August 1999 | Goswami |
D416307 | November 1999 | Williams |
D427348 | June 2000 | Huang |
6156211 | December 2000 | Gonzalez-Martin et al. |
D441114 | April 2001 | Chen |
D446877 | August 2001 | Lester |
6613225 | September 2003 | Toyoda et al. |
2005/0007778 | January 2005 | Lin |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.