U.S. patent number D534,975 [Application Number D/252,275] was granted by the patent office on 2007-01-09 for golf grip. This patent grant is currently assigned to Eaton Corporation. Invention is credited to Charles Walter Devaney, Bruce John Norton.
United States Patent | D534,975 |
Norton , et al. | January 9, 2007 |
Inventors: | Norton; Bruce John (Laurinburg, NC), Devaney; Charles Walter (Laurinburg, NC) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Eaton Corporation (Cleveland,
OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/252,275 |
Filed: | January 20, 2006 |
Current U.S. Class: | D21/756 |
Current International Class: | 2102 |
Field of Search: | ;D21/756,757 ;473/300-303 |
D235898 | July 1975 | Spencer |
D235899 | July 1975 | Spencer |
D244100 | April 1977 | Spencer |
D259802 | July 1981 | Williams |
D284298 | June 1986 | Kobayashi |
D295207 | April 1988 | Mahaffey |
D328484 | August 1992 | Hsien |
D363963 | November 1995 | Boone et al. |
D431851 | October 2000 | Anderson |
D463521 | September 2002 | Jones |
D469492 | January 2003 | Huang |
D477374 | July 2003 | Huang |
D478141 | August 2003 | Huang |
D512758 | December 2005 | Tuerschmann et al. |
D524390 | July 2006 | Tuerschmann |
D525332 | July 2006 | Miller |
D525673 | July 2006 | Miller |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.