Case
Conway December 19, 2
U.S. patent number D533,715 [Application Number D/252,826] was granted by the patent office on 2006-12-19 for case. Invention is credited to Gary Roy Conway.
| United States Patent | D533,715 |
| Conway | December 19, 2006 |
Case
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for case, as shown.
| Inventors: | Conway; Gary Roy (Cobham, Surrey, GB) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/252,826 |
| Filed: | January 27, 2006 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/206 |
| Current International Class: | 0301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D3/201,203,205,206,265,300 ;D19/35,75,81,82,85 ;24/10R ;211/65,69,69.1,69.8,69.9 ;206/37,38,214,371,5,216,380,381 ;281/30 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2262472 | November 1941 | Sloan |
| D164587 | September 1951 | Marks |
| D236462 | August 1975 | Malberg |
| D251952 | May 1979 | Washburn |
| D397547 | September 1998 | Goodwin et al. |
| 6814226 | November 2004 | Chao |
Assistant Examiner: Weingart; Monica A.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Faegre & Benson LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view.
FIG. 2 is a rear view.
FIG. 3 is a left side view.
FIG. 4 is a right side view.
FIG. 5 is a top view.
FIG. 6 is a bottom view; and,
FIG. 7 is a perspective view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 