Couch
Wilson , et al. October 17, 2
U.S. patent number D530,112 [Application Number D/239,716] was granted by the patent office on 2006-10-17 for couch. This patent grant is currently assigned to Target Brands, Inc.. Invention is credited to Ryan P. McCoy, James A. Wilson.
| United States Patent | D530,112 |
| Wilson , et al. | October 17, 2006 |
Couch
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a couch, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Wilson; James A. (Minneapolis, MN), McCoy; Ryan P. (Falcon Heights, MN) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Target Brands, Inc.
(Minneapolis, MN) |
| Appl. No.: | D/239,716 |
| Filed: | October 3, 2005 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/381 |
| Current International Class: | 0601 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/332,335-337,340,349,355,352-353,369-370,381,495,499-502 ;5/12.1 ;108/118,119,137 ;297/16.1-16.2,451.9,452.11,452.63,217.1,31,175,423.1,423.16,461,232 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2723712 | November 1955 | Yellen |
| D183743 | October 1958 | Howell, Jr. |
| 2930430 | March 1960 | Bloom |
| 3180685 | April 1965 | Rogalski et al. |
| 3642323 | February 1972 | Taylor |
| 3656808 | April 1972 | Chang |
| 3694030 | September 1972 | Grosfillex |
| 3729229 | April 1973 | Minsker |
| 3899210 | August 1975 | Samhammer et al. |
| D239581 | April 1976 | Cuneo |
| D242310 | November 1976 | Fister |
| D244643 | June 1977 | Deaton et al. |
| D249989 | October 1978 | Radaelli |
| D270502 | September 1983 | Coronado |
| 4421356 | December 1983 | Singer |
| D295238 | April 1988 | Gammelgaard |
| D304266 | October 1989 | Frinier |
| D368176 | March 1996 | Mourgue |
| 5496094 | March 1996 | Schwartzkopf et al. |
| 5499857 | March 1996 | Lynch, Jr. |
| D387570 | December 1997 | Mourgue |
| D397264 | August 1998 | Joseph |
| 6332646 | December 2001 | Tseng |
| D460874 | July 2002 | Joseph |
| 6447057 | September 2002 | Chen |
| D475860 | June 2003 | Yang |
| 6616238 | September 2003 | Guery-Strahm |
| 6702371 | March 2004 | Zheng |
| 6840573 | January 2005 | Yao |
| 6848740 | February 2005 | Reese |
| 6932425 | August 2005 | Tseng |
| 6938951 | September 2005 | Tseng |
| 6971712 | December 2005 | Tseng |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Dicke, Billig & Czaja, PLLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a couch according to an embodiment of the invention, with elements in dashed lines forming no part of the claimed design.
FIG. 2 is a right side view of a couch according to an embodiment of the invention, with elements in dashed lines forming no part of the claimed design. A left side view of a couch is an identical mirror image of FIG. 2 and is omitted.
FIG. 3 is a front view of a couch according to an embodiment of the invention, with elements in dashed lines forming no part of the claimed design.
FIG. 4 is a back view of a couch according to an embodiment of the invention, with elements in dashed lines forming no part of the claimed design.
FIG. 5 is a top view of a couch according to an embodiment of the invention, with elements in dashed lines forming no part of the claimed design; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom view of a couch according to an embodiment of the invention, with elements in dashed lines forming no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 