U.S. patent number D526,767 [Application Number D/239,724] was granted by the patent office on 2006-08-22 for footwear upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to Global Brand Marketing, Inc.. Invention is credited to Mathew Drazic.
United States Patent | D526,767 |
Drazic | August 22, 2006 |
Inventors: | Drazic; Mathew (Santa Barbara, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Global Brand Marketing, Inc.
(Santa Barbara, CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/239,724 |
Filed: | October 3, 2005 |
Current U.S. Class: | D2/969 |
Current International Class: | 0299 |
Field of Search: | ;D2/902,907,908,943,944,969,972-974 ;36/45,50.1,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-131 |
D69798 | March 1926 | Gilson |
D73396 | September 1927 | Bates |
D73397 | September 1927 | Bates |
D83790 | March 1931 | Brown |
D103054 | February 1937 | Lutz |
D118417 | January 1940 | Pick |
D157902 | March 1950 | Price |
D217950 | July 1970 | Einstein, Jr. |
D232277 | August 1974 | Vargo |
D245735 | September 1977 | Fukuoka |
D293386 | December 1987 | Kelley |
D360064 | July 1995 | Verin |
D376896 | December 1996 | O'Rorke |
D462159 | September 2002 | Covatch |
D475510 | June 2003 | Reynolds |
D478414 | August 2003 | Robinson et al. |
D496524 | September 2004 | Kuerbis |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.