U.S. patent number D524,844 [Application Number D/215,720] was granted by the patent office on 2006-07-11 for eyeglasses. This patent grant is currently assigned to All-Logic Int. Co., Ltd.. Invention is credited to Shun-Tien Yang.
United States Patent | D524,844 |
Yang | July 11, 2006 |
Inventors: | Yang; Shun-Tien (Yung-Kang, TW) |
---|---|
Assignee: | All-Logic Int. Co., Ltd.
(Tainan Hsien, TW) |
Appl. No.: | D/215,720 |
Filed: | October 21, 2004 |
May 3, 2004 [TW] | 93302538 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D16/315; D16/326 |
Current International Class: | 1606 |
Field of Search: | ;D16/300-330,101,332-338 ;D29/109-110 ;D24/110.2 ;351/41,44,51-52,158,92,103-111,130,61,86,114-119,122-123 ;2/426-432,448,441,447,434-437 |
5602603 | February 1997 | Bondet |
D404055 | January 1999 | Davis |
D457182 | May 2002 | Rask |
6460996 | October 2002 | Okui et al. |
6491388 | December 2002 | Chen |
D477834 | July 2003 | Sheldon |
US. Appl. No. 29/212,224, filed Aug. 26, 2004. cited by other . U.S. Appl. No. 29/213,708, filed Sep. 21, 2004. cited by other . U.S. Appl. No. 29/217,311, filed Nov. 15, 2004. cited by other . U.S. Appl. No. 29/217,879, filed Nov. 22, 2004. cited by other. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.