U.S. patent number D516,307 [Application Number D/180,707] was granted by the patent office on 2006-03-07 for duffle with integral storage shroud. Invention is credited to Thomas L. Koenig, Margaret M. Raible.
United States Patent | D516,307 |
Koenig , et al. | March 7, 2006 |
Inventors: | Koenig; Thomas L. (Benicia, CA), Raible; Margaret M. (Benicia, CA) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/180,707 |
Filed: | April 28, 2003 |
Current U.S. Class: | D3/233; D3/289 |
Current International Class: | 0301 |
Field of Search: | ;D3/232-246,254,284-289,301,303,900,901,902 ;150/100,106-118,120-122,900 ;190/1,103-109,112,113,115,117,119 ;383/2,4,22,24,32,98,71,72,76,907,15,16 |
D136996 | January 1944 | Blake |
2597194 | May 1952 | Sholl |
D235384 | June 1975 | Theilkas |
4361215 | November 1982 | Sawai |
D286229 | October 1986 | Knoepke et al. |
D354851 | January 1995 | Smith et al. |
D361662 | August 1995 | King et al. |
D368160 | March 1996 | Carretta |
D383903 | September 1997 | Kopel |
D386300 | November 1997 | Kopel |
D411764 | July 1999 | Vazquez |
D439040 | March 2001 | Vazquez |
D447625 | September 2001 | Vazquez |
D465924 | November 2002 | Gisser |
D474336 | May 2003 | Nally |
D497051 | October 2004 | Nieves |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.