Portion of a shoe upper
Avar February 14, 2
U.S. patent number D514,798 [Application Number D/221,456] was granted by the patent office on 2006-02-14 for portion of a shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nike, Inc.. Invention is credited to Eric P. Avar.
| United States Patent | D514,798 |
| Avar | February 14, 2006 |
Portion of a shoe upper
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a portion of a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Avar; Eric P. (Aloha, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Nike, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/221,456 |
| Filed: | January 18, 2005 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/902,907,908,943,944,969,972-974 ;36/45,50.1,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-131 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D311268 | October 1990 | Hatfield |
| D318563 | July 1991 | Lucas |
| D318942 | August 1991 | Ringel et al. |
| D320498 | October 1991 | Hatfield |
| D320689 | October 1991 | Smith |
| D326353 | May 1992 | Close |
| D326354 | May 1992 | Hatfield |
| D327162 | June 1992 | Hatfield |
| D330452 | October 1992 | Hatfield et al. |
| D337873 | August 1993 | Backus |
| D343046 | January 1994 | Feller et al. |
| D348559 | July 1994 | Preskar |
| D385398 | October 1997 | Avar |
| D391070 | February 1998 | Ford |
| D391752 | March 1998 | Von Conta |
| D392793 | March 1998 | Koh |
| D400000 | October 1998 | Hatfield et al. |
| D400698 | November 1998 | Koh |
| D411249 | June 1999 | Maxwell |
| D413427 | September 1999 | Fellouhe |
| D424291 | May 2000 | Matis |
| D430724 | September 2000 | Matis et al. |
| D431714 | October 2000 | Hatfield et al. |
| D475519 | June 2003 | Morris |
| D490604 | June 2004 | Cooper |
| D496528 | September 2004 | Mueller |
Other References
|
Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Spring 2005, pp. M7, M10 and M14, dated Aug. 2004. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Spring 2003, p. M98, dated Sep. 2002. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 2003, p. M11, dated Nov. 2002. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Holiday 2002, p. M59, dated Mar. 2002. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Spring 2002, p. W32, dated Sep. 2001. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 2001, p. M11, dated Nov. 2000. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Spring 1999, pp. W21 and M30, dated Jun. 1998. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 1998, p. 8, dated Dec. 1998. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Spring 1998, p. 8, dated Sep. 1997. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Spring 1997, p. 131, dated Jun. 1996. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a portion of a shoe upper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof.
The broken lines immediately adjacent to the shaded area represent an unclaimed boundary of the design. The broken line showing within the shaded area and the broken line showing of the remainder of the shoe are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 