U.S. patent number D508,967 [Application Number D/222,649] was granted by the patent office on 2005-08-30 for girl toy figure. Invention is credited to Dyke N. Robinson.
United States Patent | D508,967 |
Robinson | August 30, 2005 |
Inventors: | Robinson; Dyke N. (Katy, TX) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/222,649 |
Filed: | February 2, 2005 |
Current U.S. Class: | D21/578; D21/594; D21/622; D21/648 |
Current International Class: | 2101 |
Field of Search: | ;D21/576,578-584,585,593,594,621,622,623,627,631,630,640,645-649 ;D11/160 ;446/268,279,97-101,285,316,297-303,317,355,376-384 |
D70996 | August 1926 | Willmott |
D142172 | August 1945 | MacCallum |
3579901 | May 1971 | Perhacs, Jr. |
D253711 | December 1979 | Christiansen et al. |
D262474 | December 1981 | Doornick et al. |
D290032 | May 1987 | Horiuchi |
D290146 | June 1987 | Horiuchi |
4673371 | June 1987 | Furukawa |
4752272 | June 1988 | Karasawa |
D304962 | December 1989 | Watanabe |
D486191 | February 2004 | Robinson |
Hong Kong Toys, 1987, p. 56, robots by Topmark International Limited. . Hong Kong Toys, Vol. 1, 1995, p. 423 robot toys. . Chiasso Catalog, Summer, 2001, p. 30, "Intellibot" robot. . FAO Schwarz, Holiday, 2001, p. 65, toy robots.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.