U.S. patent number D507,646 [Application Number D/195,914] was granted by the patent office on 2005-07-19 for ceiling fan blade. This patent grant is currently assigned to Minka Lighting, Inc.. Invention is credited to Stanfield Young.
United States Patent | D507,646 |
Young | July 19, 2005 |
Inventors: | Young; Stanfield (Garden Grove, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Minka Lighting, Inc. (Corona,
CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/195,914 |
Filed: | December 18, 2003 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/413 |
Current International Class: | 2304 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/413,411,377,379,385 ;416/5 |
D454636 | March 2002 | Lantz |
D479597 | September 2003 | Curtin |
Royal Pacific Internet Catalog; Bahama Palm Leaf & Carved Wood Blade Ceiling Fan, Model # 1012-BP, printed from www.fanshack.com, Nov. 17, 2003, Royal Pacific Ceiling Fans. . Fanimation Internet Catalog; The Louvre ceiling fan, Model No. FP1320GZ; Printed from www.fanimation.com, Feb. 20, 2004, Fanimation Fans. . Hampton Bay Ceiling fan, Model No. 73554; Printed from www.homedepot.com, Feb. 20, 2004, Home Depot. . Kona Bay ceiling fan, Model No. K52AW; Printed from www.craftmade.com, Feb 20, 2004, Craftmade International, Inc.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.