U.S. patent number D505,093 [Application Number D/195,003] was granted by the patent office on 2005-05-17 for diamond setting comprising oval shape total 10 round diamond. This patent grant is currently assigned to Fine Jewellery (India) Ltd.. Invention is credited to Prem Kothari.
United States Patent | D505,093 |
Kothari | May 17, 2005 |
Inventors: | Kothari; Prem (Mumbai, IN) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Fine Jewellery (India) Ltd.
(Andheri, IN) |
Appl. No.: | D/195,003 |
Filed: | December 3, 2003 |
Current U.S. Class: | D11/91 |
Current International Class: | 1101 |
Field of Search: | ;D11/89-94,85-86,79-81,16,26,34 ;63/15,26-31,35 |
434405 | August 1890 | Schill |
D149469 | May 1948 | Bogoff |
D150675 | August 1948 | Bogoff |
D374410 | October 1996 | Tanory, Jr. |
D422935 | April 2000 | Chan |
D460017 | July 2002 | Chan |
Spiegel Catalog Spring 2001.quadrature..quadrature.p. 251 Endless Diamonds Jewelry collection.* . Fendt Finding Company, Inc. 1987.quadrature..quadrature.p. 30 TR189 marquise shape setting.* . Baker Settings, 1981.quadrature..quadrature.cluster settings.* . Service Merchandise 1994/95.quadrature..quadrature.p. 37 Item No. 36 and 43-pear-shaped pendants.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.