U.S. patent number D504,197 [Application Number D/194,853] was granted by the patent office on 2005-04-19 for combination pet food and water dish. This patent grant is currently assigned to Rubbermaid, Incorporated. Invention is credited to Chris Beilstein, Todd Huthmaker.
United States Patent | D504,197 |
Huthmaker , et al. | April 19, 2005 |
Inventors: | Huthmaker; Todd (Wooster, OH), Beilstein; Chris (Wooster, OH) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Rubbermaid, Incorporated
(Wooster, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/194,853 |
Filed: | December 2, 2003 |
Current U.S. Class: | D30/129 |
Current International Class: | 3003 |
Field of Search: | ;D30/121,128,129,132 ;119/51.5,57.5,61.5,61.54-61.55 ;D7/553.4-553.8,546 |
4357905 | November 1982 | Carpenter |
4658759 | April 1987 | Brown |
4976223 | December 1990 | Pierce |
5560316 | October 1996 | Lillelund |
5752464 | May 1998 | King et al. |
5975016 | November 1999 | Wesenhagen |
5979361 | November 1999 | Willinger |
6142101 | November 2000 | Pelsor |
6145474 | November 2000 | Lemkin |
6209487 | April 2001 | Quinlan et al. |
Richell USA Inc. Corporate Website MP Bowl, https://www.richellusa.com/product/pet/mpbowl.html, printed Feb. 27, 2004.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.