U.S. patent number D501,520 [Application Number D/205,226] was granted by the patent office on 2005-02-01 for ribbed ball. Invention is credited to Raymond E. Fraze.
United States Patent | D501,520 |
Fraze | February 1, 2005 |
Inventors: | Fraze; Raymond E. (Alameda, CA) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/205,226 |
Filed: | May 10, 2004 |
Current U.S. Class: | D21/707 |
Current International Class: | 2102 |
Field of Search: | ;D21/707-714,438-440 ;446/220-226 ;473/569-614 |
1964008 | June 1934 | Roberts |
2078382 | April 1937 | Hanshaw |
D159718 | August 1950 | Daniel et al. |
2795425 | June 1957 | Orms |
D219284 | November 1970 | Hunt |
3633587 | January 1972 | Hunt |
4194737 | March 1980 | Farmer |
4223474 | September 1980 | Strauss |
4318244 | March 1982 | Magid et al. |
D298957 | December 1988 | Van, Jr. |
4834382 | May 1989 | Spector |
4850927 | July 1989 | Caranica |
4917382 | April 1990 | Hendershott |
4974844 | December 1990 | Richards |
D340489 | October 1993 | Evangelista |
5372381 | December 1994 | Herridge |
D385002 | October 1997 | Schloss |
6056622 | May 2000 | Chung |
D441407 | May 2001 | Goldman |
D468378 | January 2003 | Routzong |
D469484 | January 2003 | Dawson |
D473021 | April 2003 | Gourley |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.