U.S. patent number D497,918 [Application Number D/175,964] was granted by the patent office on 2004-11-02 for lawn mower. This patent grant is currently assigned to Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha. Invention is credited to George B. Graus, Junya Inukai, Yuya Kato, Christopher M. Osborne, Vincent A. Prinzo.
United States Patent | D497,918 |
Osborne , et al. | November 2, 2004 |
Inventors: | Osborne; Christopher M. (Hillsborough, NC), Prinzo; Vincent A. (Hillsborough, NC), Graus; George B. (Mebane, NC), Kato; Yuya (Saitama, JP), Inukai; Junya (Saitama, JP) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki
Kaisha (Tokyo, JP) |
Appl. No.: | D/175,964 |
Filed: | February 14, 2003 |
Current U.S. Class: | D15/14 |
Current International Class: | 1503 |
Field of Search: | ;D15/14-18,10 ;56/11.3,202-206,11.8,255,10.9,12.7,16.7-16.9,17.2-17.6,249,256,320.1,320.2 ;180/89.1,89.12,900 |
D276047 | October 1984 | Sasaki |
D308681 | June 1990 | Sadakane et al. |
D358400 | May 1995 | Gray et al. |
D371165 | June 1996 | Stambolic et al. |
5910091 | June 1999 | Iida et al. |
D421265 | February 2000 | Ohsumi et al. |
D456030 | April 2002 | Maeda |
Honda Lawn Mower p. 27 popular science vol. 6 Jun. 2001.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.