U.S. patent number D497,298 [Application Number D/195,689] was granted by the patent office on 2004-10-19 for belt sander. This patent grant is currently assigned to One World Technologies, Limited. Invention is credited to Kenneth M. Brazell, Thomas Shea Tillman.
United States Patent | D497,298 |
Tillman , et al. | October 19, 2004 |
Inventors: | Tillman; Thomas Shea (Anderson, SC), Brazell; Kenneth M. (Piedmont, SC) |
---|---|
Assignee: | One World Technologies, Limited
(Hamilton, BM) |
Appl. No.: | D/195,689 |
Filed: | December 16, 2003 |
Current U.S. Class: | D8/62 |
Current International Class: | 0801 |
Field of Search: | ;D8/61,62,67,69 ;173/170,171 ;310/50 ;451/344,351,352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,451,456 |
4177609 | December 1979 | Rameckers et al. |
4584797 | April 1986 | Wanninkhof et al. |
4967516 | November 1990 | Hoshino et al. |
D323099 | January 1992 | Sakamoto et al. |
5094000 | March 1992 | Becht et al. |
D328695 | August 1992 | Hoshino et al. |
5725086 | March 1998 | Cooper |
D400073 | October 1998 | Hara |
D420875 | February 2000 | Okitsu et al. |
6159085 | December 2000 | Hara |
D453668 | February 2002 | Pretzell |
D478261 | August 2003 | Sham |
D487008 | February 2004 | Andriolo |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.