Nose clip
Chiang August 17, 2
U.S. patent number D494,671 [Application Number D/182,102] was granted by the patent office on 2004-08-17 for nose clip. Invention is credited to Herman Chiang.
| United States Patent | D494,671 |
| Chiang | August 17, 2004 |
Nose clip
Claims
The ornamental design for a nose clip, as show and described.
| Inventors: | Chiang; Herman (Chung-Ho City, Taipei Hsien, TW) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/182,102 |
| Filed: | May 21, 2003 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/106 |
| Current International Class: | 2404 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/106 ;606/151,157,201,204 ;128/201.18,200.24,858 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2620793 | December 1952 | Gollubier |
| 5103813 | April 1992 | Hart et al. |
| D375552 | November 1996 | Davi |
| 6561184 | May 2003 | Chiang |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Troxell Law Office PLLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a top, left, front, perspective view of a nose clip showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right elevational view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 