Barbell bottle
Martin April 27, 2
U.S. patent number D489,001 [Application Number D/172,704] was granted by the patent office on 2004-04-27 for barbell bottle. Invention is credited to Kevin P. Martin.
| United States Patent | D489,001 |
| Martin | April 27, 2004 |
Barbell bottle
Claims
The ornamental design for barbell bottle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Martin; Kevin P. (Naperville, IL) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/172,704 |
| Filed: | December 17, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/668; D9/503 |
| Current International Class: | 0901 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/307,500-504,549,556,557,559 ;D21/681 ;215/379-384,400 ;482/106,108 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D317256 | June 1991 | Samuels |
| D337522 | July 1993 | Kingsbury |
| 5620112 | April 1997 | Brown |
| 5857946 | January 1999 | Brown |
| 6132344 | October 2000 | Vanderbleek |
| D456705 | May 2002 | Vijn |
| D465151 | November 2002 | Mixon |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Shields; H. Gordon
Description
FIG. 1 is a top view of a barbell bottle illustrating my new ornamental design.
FIG. 2 is a bottom view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a side view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 