Two tier gazebo
Wang December 9, 2
U.S. patent number D483,498 [Application Number D/164,095] was granted by the patent office on 2003-12-09 for two tier gazebo. This patent grant is currently assigned to Dragon Claw (U.S.A.) Incorporated. Invention is credited to Leo Chi-Hong Wang.
| United States Patent | D483,498 |
| Wang | December 9, 2003 |
Two tier gazebo
Claims
The ornamental design for a two tier gazebo, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Wang; Leo Chi-Hong (Arcadia, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Dragon Claw (U.S.A.)
Incorporated (Irwindale, CA) |
| Appl. No.: | D/164,095 |
| Filed: | July 17, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D25/56 |
| Current International Class: | 2502 |
| Field of Search: | ;D25/1,56,61 ;52/82 ;135/87,90,908,907 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D385969 | November 1997 | Kievit |
| D420751 | February 2000 | Powell et al. |
| D458689 | June 2002 | Wang |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Rozsa; Thomas I. Chen; Tony D.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a two tier gazebo, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof; all of the sides being identical; and,
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 