U.S. patent number D482,939 [Application Number D/165,664] was granted by the patent office on 2003-12-02 for serving spoon. This patent grant is currently assigned to Dart Industries Inc.. Invention is credited to Robert H. C. M. Daenen, Jakob Heiberg, Hanne Dalsgaard Jeppesen, Stig Lillelund.
United States Patent | D482,939 |
Lillelund , et al. | December 2, 2003 |
Inventors: | Lillelund; Stig (Gentofte, DK), Jeppesen; Hanne Dalsgaard (Holte, DK), Heiberg; Jakob (Charlottenlund, DK), Daenen; Robert H. C. M. (Aalst, BE) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Dart Industries Inc. (Orlando,
FL) |
Appl. No.: | D/165,664 |
Filed: | August 14, 2002 |
Current U.S. Class: | D7/691 |
Current International Class: | 0702 |
Field of Search: | ;D7/682-696,393,395,401.2,642,643,653-664 ;30/324-328,147-150 ;294/55 |
D153616 | May 1949 | Mercer |
D193266 | July 1962 | Wada |
D209014 | October 1967 | Soehara et al. |
D210319 | February 1968 | Wallance |
4563816 | January 1986 | Jagger |
D307095 | April 1990 | Juergens |
D318990 | August 1991 | Giugiaro |
5376325 | December 1994 | Ormson |
D402168 | December 1998 | Joergensen |
D407611 | April 1999 | Shane-Schuldt |
D408217 | April 1999 | LoGiudice |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.