Marker
Geiselhart , et al. March 11, 2
U.S. patent number D471,586 [Application Number D/161,699] was granted by the patent office on 2003-03-11 for marker. This patent grant is currently assigned to Berol Corporation. Invention is credited to Antonio J. Belton, Chad E. Davis, Edward Geiselhart, Phillip M. Holsinger, Craig Scherer.
| United States Patent | D471,586 |
| Geiselhart , et al. | March 11, 2003 |
Marker
Claims
The ornamental design for a "marker", as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Geiselhart; Edward (West Dundee, IL), Belton; Antonio J. (Hazel Crest, IL), Holsinger; Phillip M. (Chicago, IL), Davis; Chad E. (Chicago, IL), Scherer; Craig (Wilmette, IL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Berol Corporation (Freeport,
IL) |
| Appl. No.: | D/161,699 |
| Filed: | June 3, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D19/163; D19/914; D19/934 |
| Current International Class: | 1906 |
| Field of Search: | ;D19/35,36,41-51,53-58,81-85 ;401/6,7,88,52,98,99,196,184,198,202,213,243-247,261,262,195 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D279992 | August 1985 | Gribb |
| D295878 | May 1988 | Lovell |
| D307444 | April 1990 | Poisson et al. |
| D330388 | October 1992 | Choi |
| 5338123 | August 1994 | Obersteller et al. |
| 5358349 | October 1994 | Burroughs et al. |
| D400581 | November 1998 | Hasegawa |
| 5971644 | October 1999 | Kageyama et al. |
| D417206 | November 1999 | Hirota |
| D420048 | February 2000 | Sims et al. |
| D433446 | November 2000 | Rosenbaum |
| D445130 | July 2001 | Ginelli |
| D446213 | August 2001 | Chen et al. |
| D456842 | May 2002 | Ono |
| D460982 | July 2002 | Bianco, Jr. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Marshall, Gerstein & Borun
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view as seen from the top, front and right side of a marker showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view, the rear view being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right elevational view, the left elevational view being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a second embodiment of FIG. 1, the only difference being the overall proportion of the marker, it being understood that all other surfaces are the same as those of the first embodiment;
FIG. 7 is a second embodiment of FIG. 2, the only difference being the overall proportion of the marker, it being understood that all other surfaces are the same as those of the first embodiment; and,
FIG. 8 is a second embodiment of FIG. 3, the only difference being the overall proportion of the marker, it being understood that all other surfaces are the same as those of the first embodiment.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 