U.S. patent number D468,591 [Application Number D/142,317] was granted by the patent office on 2003-01-14 for clamping display rack. This patent grant is currently assigned to Dart Industries Inc.. Invention is credited to Ian Tomas Benzon, Robert H. C. M. Daenen, Jakob Heiberg, Stig Lillelund.
United States Patent | D468,591 |
Lillelund , et al. | January 14, 2003 |
Inventors: | Lillelund; Stig (Gentofte, DK), Heiberg; Jakob (Charlottenlund, DK), Benzon; Ian Tomas (Copenhagen, DK), Daenen; Robert H. C. M. (Aalst, BE) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Dart Industries Inc. (Orlando,
FL) |
Appl. No.: | D/142,317 |
Filed: | May 23, 2001 |
Current U.S. Class: | D7/590; D7/701 |
Current International Class: | 0706 |
Field of Search: | ;D7/590,701,707,708 ;D6/513,514,553,567,569 ;211/13.1,70.6,70.7,74,75,86.01,87.01 ;248/309.1,311.2,88.01 |
2028694 | January 1936 | Spinks |
D261891 | November 1981 | Thompson |
4378889 | April 1983 | Lebowtiz |
D278585 | April 1985 | Oldham |
4583647 | April 1986 | Schinzing |
D290573 | June 1987 | Drummond |
D291637 | September 1987 | Burin |
4984693 | January 1991 | Belokin, Jr. et al. |
5396997 | March 1995 | Johnson |
5687856 | November 1997 | Kendrena |
D396783 | August 1998 | Lee |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.