Bird cage
Weiping January 7, 2
U.S. patent number D468,488 [Application Number D/142,071] was granted by the patent office on 2003-01-07 for bird cage. Invention is credited to Yang Weiping.
| United States Patent | D468,488 |
| Weiping | January 7, 2003 |
Bird cage
Claims
The ornamental design for a bird cage, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Weiping; Yang (Taishsan City, Guangdong, CN) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/142,071 |
| Filed: | May 17, 2001 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D30/114 |
| Current International Class: | 3002 |
| Field of Search: | ;D30/101-106,108-119 ;119/416,418-420,428-435,452-456,458-472,474-475,477,479,482,484-485,489-491 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 162142 | April 1875 | Belmer |
| 229022 | June 1880 | Whipple |
| 311366 | January 1885 | Rex |
| 341540 | May 1886 | Armstrong |
| 459396 | September 1891 | Gilbert |
| 809559 | January 1906 | Gault |
| 1149809 | August 1915 | Cessna |
| D67555 | June 1925 | Schuetze |
| D79081 | July 1929 | Hoefler |
| 1729661 | October 1929 | Leon |
| 1907194 | May 1933 | Webster |
| D103881 | March 1937 | Miller |
| 2133550 | October 1938 | Little |
| 2178117 | October 1939 | Hillenek |
| 2231334 | February 1941 | Havlis |
| D127806 | June 1941 | Little et al. |
| 2539024 | January 1951 | Leiby |
| D162016 | February 1951 | Doolittle |
| 2601197 | June 1952 | Wilson |
| 2693786 | November 1954 | Babros et al. |
| 2806446 | September 1957 | Hendryx |
| 3029788 | April 1962 | Voss |
| 3672332 | June 1972 | MacLeod et al. |
| 3862620 | January 1975 | Bernhard et al. |
| D255272 | June 1980 | Voss |
| D256957 | September 1980 | Justl |
| D260566 | September 1981 | Biro et al. |
| 4570574 | February 1986 | Burkholderr |
| 4572107 | February 1986 | Clarizo |
| 4577589 | March 1986 | Voss et al. |
| 4617873 | October 1986 | Kelmetis |
| D287650 | January 1987 | Braeuner |
| D308737 | June 1990 | Daily |
| 5000121 | March 1991 | Daily |
| D340321 | October 1993 | Bonn |
| D340550 | October 1993 | Teats |
| D353030 | November 1994 | Fernandez |
| 5373810 | December 1994 | Martin |
| D359589 | June 1995 | Kohus et al. |
| D359590 | June 1995 | Kohus et al. |
| D360493 | July 1995 | Kohus et al. |
| D372561 | August 1996 | Lai |
| 5579703 | December 1996 | King |
| D377546 | January 1997 | King |
| D386833 | November 1997 | King |
| 5738042 | April 1998 | King |
| D399610 | October 1998 | Ohadi |
| 5957086 | September 1999 | Gallardo |
| 5996536 | December 1999 | King |
| 6003908 | December 1999 | King |
| D424756 | May 2000 | Huang |
| D426035 | May 2000 | Huang |
| D441147 | April 2001 | Huang |
| 2005203 | Jun 1991 | CA | |||
| 2220581 | May 1999 | CA | |||
| 2220619 | Dec 1999 | CA | |||
| 2222392 | Dec 1999 | CA | |||
| 1529765 | Oct 1978 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hahn Loeser + Parks LLP Grant; Stephen L.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of the bird cage of the present invention, the rear view being a mirror image, but lacking a rear door;
FIG. 2 is a top view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side view thereof, the opposite side being a mirror image;
FIG. 4 is a bottom view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a perspective view thereof showing the top and front in the open position.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 