Dresser
Wanek , et al. April 9, 2
U.S. patent number D455,289 [Application Number D/131,043] was granted by the patent office on 2002-04-09 for dresser. This patent grant is currently assigned to Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Eric Cook, Ronald Wanek.
| United States Patent | D455,289 |
| Wanek , et al. | April 9, 2002 |
Dresser
Claims
We claim the ornamental design for a dresser, as shown.
| Inventors: | Wanek; Ronald (Arcadia, WI), Cook; Eric (LaCrosse, WI) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Ashley Furniture Industries,
Inc. (Arcadia, WI) |
| Appl. No.: | D/131,043 |
| Filed: | October 11, 2000 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/671.1 |
| Current International Class: | 0604 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/396,432,434,436,440,445,446,448,449,486 ;312/204 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D420231 | February 2000 | Draper |
| D423810 | May 2000 | Dorst |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a dresser according to the new design.
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a left elevational view, the right side being a mirror image thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 