Pressure gauge
Van Zeyl April 24, 2
U.S. patent number D440,894 [Application Number D/121,022] was granted by the patent office on 2001-04-24 for pressure gauge. This patent grant is currently assigned to Measurement Specialties, Inc.. Invention is credited to Robert Van Zeyl.
| United States Patent | D440,894 |
| Van Zeyl | April 24, 2001 |
Pressure gauge
Claims
The ornamental design for a pressure gauge, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Van Zeyl; Robert (Cedar Grove, NJ) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Measurement Specialties, Inc.
(Fairfield, NJ) |
| Appl. No.: | D/121,022 |
| Filed: | March 30, 2000 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D10/86 |
| Current International Class: | 1004 |
| Field of Search: | ;D10/85,86 ;73/146.6,146.8 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D409931 | May 1999 | Petrucelli et al. |
| D427092 | June 2000 | Wu |
| 4809550 | March 1989 | Faulconer |
| 5435173 | July 1995 | Hwang |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Plevy; Arthur L. Buchanan Ingersoll PC
Description
FIG. 1 is a top view of the pressure gauge showing the new design.
FIG. 2 is a left side view.
FIG. 3 is a right side view; and,
FIG. 4 is a back view.
The dashed lines are not part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 