Portion of a shoe outsole
Clegg , et al. October 31, 2
U.S. patent number D432,764 [Application Number D/121,971] was granted by the patent office on 2000-10-31 for portion of a shoe outsole. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nike, Inc.. Invention is credited to Damon Clegg, John Hoke.
| United States Patent | D432,764 |
| Clegg , et al. | October 31, 2000 |
Portion of a shoe outsole
Claims
The ornamental design for a portion of a shoe outsole, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Clegg; Damon (Portland, OR), Hoke; John (Portland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Nike, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/121,971 |
| Filed: | April 19, 2000 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/955; D2/947; D2/954 |
| Current International Class: | 0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/760,902,904,908,909,911,914,916,920,946-948,951-962,964,972,977 ;36/22R,24.5,25A,25R,28,29,32R,43,59C,59R,102,103,129,134,149 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D68144 | July 1925 | Johnson |
| D108320 | February 1938 | Eldon |
| D127776 | June 1941 | Barber |
| D166742 | May 1952 | Fellman |
| D219503 | December 1970 | Vietas |
| D293276 | December 1987 | Schmidt-Delvin et al. |
| D310294 | September 1990 | Peterson |
| D323738 | February 1992 | Eisenbach |
| D325815 | May 1992 | Bass |
| D338325 | August 1993 | Avar |
| D366754 | February 1996 | Valverde |
| D368157 | March 1996 | Erickson |
| D388595 | January 1998 | Lucas |
| D390347 | February 1998 | Bathum |
| D391044 | February 1998 | Backus |
| D392438 | March 1998 | Backus |
| D392445 | March 1998 | Tresser |
| D392447 | March 1998 | Backus |
| D392448 | March 1998 | Backus |
| D394942 | June 1998 | Campbell et al. |
| D398746 | September 1998 | Rask |
| D401044 | November 1998 | Heine |
| D403147 | December 1998 | Erickson |
| D406938 | March 1999 | Lin |
| D411244 | June 1999 | Robinson et al. |
| D422400 | April 2000 | Brady et al. |
| 2582053 | January 1952 | Merlin |
| 2669038 | February 1954 | Werth |
| 3156988 | November 1964 | Rause |
| 4178702 | December 1979 | Mayer |
Other References
|
Nike 1984 Shoe Show Footwear Catalog, p. 44 published Nov. 1983. . Nike Fall 1986 Footwear Catalog, pp. 78 and 80, published Jan. 1986. . Nike Spring 1987 Team Sales Footwear Catalog, p. 51, published Aug. 1986. . Nike Late Spring 1996 Footwear Catalog, p. 13, published Aug. 1995. . Nike Holiday 1997 Footwear Catalog, pp. 83 and 91, published Mar. 1997. . Nike Spring 1998 Footwear Catalog, pp. 77, 80, 81 and 85, published Jun. 1997. . Nike Late Spring 1998 Footwear Catalog, pp. 91 and 92, published Sep. 1997. . Nike Holiday 1998 Footwear Catalog, p. M115, published Mar. 1998.. |
Primary Examiner: Murphy; Celia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a first perspective view of a portion of a shoe outsole showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a second perspective elevational view thereof taken from the opposite corner of the claimed portion; and,
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof.
The claimed invention includes those portions which are shown in solid lines and shaded with stippling. The broken line showing of the remainder of the shoe is for illustrative purposes only and forms no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 