U.S. patent number D430,961 [Application Number D/102,289] was granted by the patent office on 2000-09-12 for cordless upright vacuum cleaner. This patent grant is currently assigned to White Consolidated Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Vincent L. Bobrosky, Samuel E. Hohulin, Arnold L. Sepke.
United States Patent | D430,961 |
Bobrosky , et al. | September 12, 2000 |
Inventors: | Bobrosky; Vincent L. (Normal, IL), Hohulin; Samuel E. (Lexington, IL), Sepke; Arnold L. (Hudson, IL) |
---|---|
Assignee: | White Consolidated Industries,
Inc. (Cleveland, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/102,289 |
Filed: | March 22, 1999 |
Current U.S. Class: | D32/22 |
Current International Class: | 1505 |
Field of Search: | ;D32/17-18,21-22,25,30-34 ;15/320-321,323-334,329,344,347,349,350-353,410,412 |
D305373 | January 1990 | Yamamoto et al. |
D327145 | June 1992 | Kuriya |
D354593 | January 1995 | Koike |
D370321 | May 1996 | Robinette et al. |
D398098 | September 1998 | Mehaffey et al. |
D413187 | August 1999 | Wang et al. |
D415324 | October 1999 | Wang et al. |
D421164 | February 2000 | Luebbering |
4809393 | March 1989 | Goodrich et al. |
5502872 | April 1996 | Chae et al. |
5970575 | October 1999 | Lee |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.