U.S. patent number D424,006 [Application Number D/087,356] was granted by the patent office on 2000-05-02 for non-slip running-board.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Bombardier Inc.. Invention is credited to Rene Lemieux, Chris Ruske.
United States Patent |
D424,006 |
Lemieux , et al. |
May 2, 2000 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
Non-slip running-board
Claims
We claim the ornamental design for a non-slip running-board, as
shown and described.
Inventors: |
Lemieux; Rene (Valcourt,
CA), Ruske; Chris (Lakewood, CO) |
Assignee: |
Bombardier Inc. (Montreal,
CA)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/087,356 |
Filed: |
April 30, 1998 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29, 1998 [CA] |
|
|
1998-0441 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
D12/203;
D12/7 |
Current International
Class: |
1216 |
Field of
Search: |
;D12/203,207,7 ;106/36
;296/97.23 ;280/163,164.1,169,165-166 ;180/182-185,190,193 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Holtje; Nelson C.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: St. Onge Steward Johnston &
Reens LLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a side view of a non-slip running board mounted on a land
vehicle;
FIG. 2 is a front perspective view of the non-slip running-board of
FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view of the non-slip running-board of
FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the non-slip running-board of FIG.
1;
FIG. 5 is a right side elevational view of the non-slip
running-board of FIG. 1;
FIG. 6 is a sectional view of Section 6--6 of the non-slip
running-board of FIG. 4;
FIG. 7 is a sectional view of Section 7--7 of the non-slip
running-board of FIG. 4;
FIG. 8 is a sectional view of Section 8--8 of the non-slip
running-board of FIG. 4;
FIG. 9 is a top plan view of a second embodiment of a non-slip
running board;
FIG. 10 is a top plan view of a third embodiment of a non-slip
running board;
FIG. 11 is a right side elevational view of the non-slip
running-board of FIG. 10; and,
FIG. 12 is a front elevational view of the non-slip running-board
of FIG. 10.
The drawings show three designs which do not differ substantially
from each other. FIGS. 1-8 show the first variant. FIG. 9 shows the
second variant. FIGS. 10-12 show the third variant. The first
variant has a lip (the left-side extension shown in FIG. 4) with
three holes. The second variant has a lip with no holes. The third
variant has no lip. The broken line showing of a typical land
vehicle is for illustrative purposes only and forms no part of the
claimed design.
* * * * *