Sheet bread
Marsh , et al. February 2, 1
U.S. patent number D405,214 [Application Number D/085,427] was granted by the patent office on 1999-02-02 for sheet bread. Invention is credited to Michael E. Marsh, Stacey L. Marsh.
| United States Patent | D405,214 |
| Marsh , et al. | February 2, 1999 |
Sheet bread
Claims
The ornamental design for a sheet bread, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Marsh; Stacey L. (Ann Arbor, MI), Marsh; Michael E. (Ann Arbor, MI) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/085,427 |
| Filed: | March 23, 1998 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D26/129 |
| Current International Class: | 0101 |
| Field of Search: | ;D1/101,126,127,128,129 ;426/104 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D101614 | October 1936 | Burry |
| D115322 | June 1939 | Streit |
| D353032 | December 1994 | Mistretta |
| 794287 | July 1905 | Faust |
Other References
|
Food Processing Industry, p. 41, cracker (item A), D1/129 Oct. 1970.. |
Primary Examiner: Lucas; Susan J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Deimen; James M.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a sheet bread showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a bottom plan view;
FIG. 3 is a front or back elevational view; and,
FIG. 4 is a left or right end view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 