Shoe sole
von Conta February 2, 1
U.S. patent number D404,899 [Application Number D/081,861] was granted by the patent office on 1999-02-02 for shoe sole. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Rockport Company, Inc.. Invention is credited to Peter von Conta.
| United States Patent | D404,899 |
| von Conta | February 2, 1999 |
Shoe sole
Claims
The ornamental design for a shoe sole, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | von Conta; Peter (Newton, MA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Rockport Company, Inc.
(Marlboro, MA) |
| Appl. No.: | D/081,861 |
| Filed: | January 9, 1998 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72541 | Jun 18, 1997 | Des. 395347 | |||
| 51474 | Mar 11, 1996 | Des. 380594 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/957; D2/954; D2/959 |
| Current International Class: | 0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/897,902,906,908,914,916,919,946-962,964 ;36/44,85,101,103,104,106,113-115,124,126,127-130,3B,11.5,12-15,22R,25R,3R |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D77152 | December 1928 | Greene |
| D92853 | July 1934 | Martel |
| D112429 | December 1938 | Tebutt |
| D145944 | November 1946 | Knisely |
| D281286 | November 1985 | Mangini et al. |
| D303317 | September 1989 | Nakano |
| D306516 | March 1990 | Whatley |
| D317829 | July 1991 | Austin |
| D319725 | September 1991 | Claveria |
| D320690 | October 1991 | Lucas |
| D322154 | December 1991 | Trueman |
| D343506 | January 1994 | Kusuki et al. |
| D348146 | June 1994 | Nakano |
| D357346 | April 1995 | Ho |
| D365921 | January 1996 | von Conta et al. |
| D368795 | April 1996 | Tanaka et al. |
| D369236 | April 1996 | Maltby |
| D377411 | January 1997 | Murray |
| D377859 | February 1997 | Bramani |
| D378472 | March 1997 | Bramani |
| D387892 | December 1997 | Briant |
| D389298 | January 1998 | Briant |
| D389992 | February 1998 | Rask |
| D394542 | May 1998 | Wurfbain et al. |
| 484444 | Oct 1917 | FR | |||
| 76552 | Jan 1918 | CH | |||
Other References
|
The Contour shoe, The Brooks 1986 catalog, p. 3. . The Allegro shoe, The Brooks Fall/Winter 1993 catalog. . The Motion Control shoe, The Reebok Fall 1992 catalog, p. 32. . The Brooks Beast '94 shoe, The Road Runner Sports Holiday 1995 catalog, p. 59. . The Adidas Equipment Light shoe the Asics Gel-Lyte 125 shoe, The Road Runner Sports Spring/Summer 1996 catalog, pp. 41 and 61. . The Brooks Beast '97 shoe, The Road Runner Sports Holiday 1996 catalog, p. 57. . The Brooks Radius shoe, The Road Runner Sports Feb./Mar. 1997 catalog, p. 47. . The New Balance 851 shoe, The Road Runner Sports Jun./Jul. 1997 catalog, p. 65. . The Puma Trinomic Control II shoe, The Road Runner Aug./Sep. 1997 catalog, p. 31.. |
Primary Examiner: Murphy; Celia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a bottom plan view of a shoe sole showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof.
The broken line showing of a shoe upper in the Figures is environmental only and forms no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 