External ear dressing
Doyle September 9, 1
U.S. patent number D383,545 [Application Number D/057,805] was granted by the patent office on 1997-09-09 for external ear dressing. Invention is credited to Donald E. Doyle.
| United States Patent | D383,545 |
| Doyle | September 9, 1997 |
External ear dressing
Claims
The ornamental design for an external ear dressing, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Doyle; Donald E. (Pascagoula, MS) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/057,805 |
| Filed: | August 1, 1996 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/190; D24/189 |
| Current International Class: | 2404 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/189,190,191,206 ;602/74,41 ;128/864,866,888,857 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3823713 | July 1974 | Shah |
| 4212296 | July 1980 | Schaar |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Marrs; Roger A.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an external ear dressing, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a fragmentary rear perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof, opposite that shown in FIG. 3; and,
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof, the top plan view being a mirror image thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 