U.S. patent number D380,882 [Application Number D/045,756] was granted by the patent office on 1997-07-08 for vacuum cleaner. This patent grant is currently assigned to Black & Decker Inc.. Invention is credited to Robert Osit, Anthony Brooks Rorke.
United States Patent | D380,882 |
Rorke , et al. | July 8, 1997 |
Inventors: | Rorke; Anthony Brooks (Guilford, CT), Osit; Robert (Shelton, CT) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Black & Decker Inc.
(Newark, DE) |
Appl. No.: | D/045,756 |
Filed: | October 30, 1995 |
Current U.S. Class: | D32/22 |
Current International Class: | 1505 |
Field of Search: | ;D32/21,22,31-34,38-39 ;15/320,322,323,347,350-353 |
D193834 | October 1962 | Ferar |
D231686 | May 1974 | Hewson |
D238139 | December 1975 | Goodrich |
D269558 | June 1983 | Essex |
D299176 | December 1988 | Bowerman et al. |
D309806 | August 1990 | Chieda et al. |
D312518 | November 1990 | Schick |
D329512 | September 1992 | McKnight et al. |
D334257 | March 1993 | Lawrence et al. |
D334262 | March 1993 | Lawrence et al. |
D346469 | April 1994 | Furcron et al. |
D353236 | December 1994 | Burkhardt et al. |
D355282 | February 1995 | Lawrence et al. |
D355285 | February 1995 | Lawrence et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.