U.S. patent number D375,632 [Application Number D/026,916] was granted by the patent office on 1996-11-19 for broom. Invention is credited to Edward Uranga, Ruben Uranga, Jr..
United States Patent | D375,632 |
Uranga , et al. | November 19, 1996 |
Inventors: | Uranga; Edward (Los Angeles, CA), Uranga, Jr.; Ruben (Los Angeles, CA) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/026,916 |
Filed: | August 9, 1994 |
Current U.S. Class: | D4/132; D32/50 |
Field of Search: | ;D4/132,135,199 ;15/143.1,144.1,159.1,160,146,175,171 ;D32/50,51 |
D277524 | January 1985 | Kubick |
D278009 | March 1985 | Evans |
D307517 | May 1990 | Marllory et al. |
913304 | February 1909 | Petersen |
1277230 | August 1918 | Lohstroh |
1335116 | March 1920 | Johanson |
1525438 | February 1925 | Boone |
2044595 | June 1936 | Schumann |
2090412 | August 1937 | Geiger |
2112297 | March 1938 | McGoldrick |
2648860 | August 1953 | Febvre |
2666221 | January 1954 | Stepper |
2922179 | January 1960 | Lundgren |
3108306 | October 1963 | McWilliams |
3340557 | September 1967 | Rosenzweig |
3619845 | November 1971 | Partridge et al. |
3783468 | January 1974 | Saloutos |
3795933 | March 1974 | Seufert |
4239413 | December 1980 | Wludyka |
5414889 | May 1995 | Sartori |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.